Showing posts with label 50mm. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 50mm. Show all posts

Friday, 14 June 2013

Popular Manual focus lenses on Digitial camera bodies

Here is my attempt to document some of the more popular manual SLR lenses that are being used on DSLRs / mirrorless format these days.

  • Carl Zeiss Jena DDR - Flektogon 35mm f2.4 <-------- known for its macro ability + sharpness
  • Carl Zeiss Jena DDR - Sonar 135mm f3.5 <----------- known for its bokeh
  • Pentax Takumar - SMC 50mm f1.4 <------------------ known for its sharpness + natural colors
  • Pentax Takumar - SMC 50mm f1.8 <------------------ known for its sharpness + natural colors
  • Olympus Zuiko - OM 50mm f1.4 <-------------------- known for its sharpness + vivid colors
  • Olympus Zuiko - OM 50mm f1.8 <-------------------- known for its sharpness + vivid colors
  • Nikon Nikkor - AIS 105mm f2.5 <-------------------- known for beautiful bokeh + sharpness
  • Nikon Nikkor - AIS 85mm f2 <----------------------- known for large aperture at 85mm + bokeh

as this is living and breathing list, I shall be updating it from time to time. Feel free to provide your opinion.

Monday, 31 October 2011

XR Rikenon 50mm 1:2 L, S & P versions

XR Rikenon 1:2 50mm L

Score
IQ: 9.0/10 
Build: 8.5/10
Overall Rating: 9.0/10

Specs
Focal length: 50mm
Aperture: 2 min - 16 max
Mount: M42 screw type





I personally use the 'P' version of this lens because there is no where the pin can get stuck on my PK - 4/3 lens adapter. Yet for other Pentax owners the pin is not a problem at all if it resembles a small ball bearing.
Whatever the case, the XR Rikenon 50mm f2.0 (and hence the Rikenon P 50mm f2.0) is said to be the sharpest lens in this range of any brand! The bokeh on this is fairly different to other similar lenses and is considered to be 'busy' - some like it while others hate it!

As visible from the test shots below, it appears razor sharp. I hope to run some tests against the SMC Tak and will publish the results later.

Rikenon P 50mm 1:2 @ f2
Temp adjusted to 7600
B&W layer overlayed


Rikenon P 50mm 1:2 @ f2
Temp adjusted to 7600
B&W layer overlayed



Other photo samples elsewhere on the web:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1041&message=35709282
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2242/2397544501_bf1bb9fcaf.jpg
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1022&message=34454579&q=rikenon+50mm&qf=m

Tuesday, 4 October 2011

OM 50mm 1:1.4


I have attempted to summarize all the information I could gather about these lenses' serial numbers and how they correspond to their image quality (IQ). I hope this summary serves its purposes when you are buying these lenses.

Serial Numbers:
  • less than     1,xxx,xxx  - single coated unless it has the MC label. 
  • higher than  1,xxx,xxx  - most likely multi-coated. 
  • higher than  1,050,xxx  - definitely multi-coated.  
Varieties:
  • Silvernose - these versions are identified by the chrome/silver edge of the filter rim. They are the earlier versions (s/n usually below 5xx,xxx) the OM 1.4 and usually preferred for B&W photography or Videoing using DSLRs these days.  
  • Blacknose - these versions are identified by the black edge of the filter rim and due to being the later versions are thought to be sharper having better image quality than their silvernose cousins.

IQ by serial & varieties:
s/n less than      1,xxx,xxx non-MC -- Low contrast. Moderately sharp.
s/n less than      1,xxx,xxx MC       -- High contrast except @ f1.4. Noticeably sharper than above.
s/n greater than  1,xxx,xxx MC       -- High contrastSharper than the one above.
s/n greater than  1,050,xxx MC       -- High contrastA tic better than the one above only on corners.


Really low serial number non-MC
Serial number under 1,xxx,xxx MC version
Serial number over 1,xxx,xxx MC version
- notice the green cyan tint on the front element
Although these lenses are not as sharp as the f1.8 version they are on par with them @f2.8 onward. The multi-coated version is however significantly sharper than the single-coated version and slightly sharper than the f1.8 at f2.0. The best and most consistent performers are the one with serial number higher than 1.1Million and multi-coating. Although the single coated ones are, relatively speaking, not too impressive some users have compared them to CZJ lenses and found their performance fairly decent (yet not on par) in comparison. Single coated lenses are also often used for black&white photography or videoing on modern DSLRs due to their lower contrast.

Personally, I believe that even though the difference is just perceivable between the single-coated and multi-coated versions, it is not extremely noticeable unless the photograph is blown up to poster sizes. It is definitely not noticeable for video purposes making it a very handy lens for videoing snippets of weddings.